The Sonic Insurrection pt. 2
The Panopticon Wears a Flower Crown
To attend a contemporary music festival is to participate in a meticulously staged contradiction. It is to purchase, at a price that would have once funded a season of underground gatherings, the simulacrum of one’s own liberation. We are witnessing an era of scaled-up imitation, knock-offs of knock-offs, mimicry of mimicry, and with each photocopy a little bit of the original meaning and substance disappears. Branded tie-dye, plastic flower crowns, disposable heart-shaped glasses, are not the organic symbols of a counter-culture but have become the standard “peace, love, unity, & respect” kit of a consumer class playing at transgression. The late capitalist machinery, in its relentless, vampiric genius, has not merely commercialised the rave; it has engineered a totalising system for the extraction of value from the very concept of collective joy. This is the Festival Industrial Complex: a panopticon disguised as a party, where the utopian impulse is systematically depoliticized, sanitized, and sold back to us as a branded experience of faux-liberation.
As the anonymous collective behind ‘Rigged: A Fanzine for System Failure’ notes, “The corporate rave is a condom on the soul. It promises sensation while preventing true transmission”. This capture is not passive; it is an active process of recuperation that targets the very core of what made the underground dangerous. The contemporary corporate music festival, with its sponsor-laden stages, its surveillance, its exorbitant pricing, and its management by multinational conglomerates, represents the near-total capture of the utopian impulse. Even ostensibly independent events are pressured by this logic. The infrastructure required: licenses, security, insurance - demands a professionalization and a financialization that inevitably introduces a risk-averse, bureaucratic layer between the artistic intent and the audience. The radical history is overwritten by a logic of “content delivery” and “consumer experience”. As rave-searcher Graham St John argues in his work on festival cultures, this represents a ‘neo-tribalism’ engineered for commerce, where the appearance of rebellion is meticulously curated to be just shocking enough to feel transgressive but never truly disruptive to the flow of capital.

The Dancefloor Was Never Apolitical
The argument of “ignorance” or “neutral escapism” is simply too naive. This claim is a privilege afforded only to those whose existence is not already politicized by lived reality. For the communities from which House and Techno erupted, Black, queer, working-class, femme - the dancefloor was never apolitical. It was a sanctuary and a tactical field. The genesis of this music was a direct, sonic response to deindustrialization, systemic neglect, and state violence. It was Afro-futurism as a survival strategy; the DJ, as Mike Banks of Underground Resistance proclaimed, was a guerrilla tactician waging “sonic warfare”.
This political sculpting is a living tradition, fiercely documented in underground zines and by critical thinkers who center marginalized experiences. Rave writer and DJ madison moore writes: “The dancefloor is a laboratory for experimentation, but it’s also a sanctuary, a site of radical transformation for people who are told they aren’t supposed to take up space. To dismiss it as mere escapism is to misunderstand the high stakes of fabulousness and survival for those on the edges”.
Feminist and trans thinkers from the underground have long understood the dancefloor as a contested site of bodily autonomy. In the seminal publication ‘Tenderly Brutal’, editor and noise artist Mars Template argues, “For a femme body, for a trans body, to move freely in a space without the threat of violation is a radical political act. The corporate festival, with its hyper-surveillance and its capitalist-sanctioned “vibe”, does not protect us; it polices our joy. It commodifies the appearance of safety while its very structure, the dark corners, the profit-driven security, the heteronormative crowd dynamics, recreates the dangers of the world it claims to be an escape from”. The Complex sells a safety that is conditional, a liberation that requires purchasing a wristband. The underground, in contrast, builds safety through collective accountability, what Template calls “a network of sideways glances that actually care”.
The Architecture of Complicity
Our sonic liberation is often built on a foundation of silent sacrifice. The tech that powers our sound systems, the rare earth minerals in our mixers, the cobalt in our laptop batteries, is extracted through supply chains drenched in the blood of the Global South. We dance in ecstasy on dancefloors of unacknowledged labour and eco-degradation, as a dark counterpoint to the brutal, material conditions of their creation. To ignore this is to be complicit in a global system that treats certain lands and bodies as disposable for the sake of our consumption. Only by first acknowledging this foundational violence and the manipulated nature of our desires, can we begin the difficult process of truthful critical reflection and, perhaps, move toward a model of reparative atonement that extends beyond the dancefloor.
The betrayal of the values of the underground is both crude and sophisticated, a symbiosis of blatant brandolonisation and a sinister financial architecture. The landscape is no longer populated by independent promoters but by a Russian doll of corporate ownership: from your ticket, to the festival, to Superstruct, to private equity firms like KKR, designed to obscure origins. The capital funding your “carefree” weekend is often invested in the very industries that perpetuate the crises that festival culture ostensibly opposes. As Dirty Data notes, “Your dance data is not just sold to beer companies. It feeds the algorithms of border controls. The beat is tracked, the body is mapped, the vibe is monetized and weaponized against other bodies elsewhere”.
This system thrives on the fickleness of the media cycle and the commodification of conscience. We have witnessed the performative arc of political support: the viral, hashtag-friendly outrage that quickly gives way to armchair activism and eventual fatigue. The world’s attention, so fervently fixed on Ukraine, waned as the casualties grew, while the ongoing genocides in Congo and Sudan garner incomparably smaller concern, a brutal hierarchy of grief that maps neatly onto colonial geographies. The Festival Industrial Complex mirrors this selective attention. Its ultimate litmus test has been the livestreamed atrocities from Gaza, and the silence has been deafening.
Events like Tomorrowland, which drape themselves in a sea of national flags, are often cloaked in hollow, globalist pageantry. They fundamentally mistake the aesthetic of diversity for its substance. They believe they are celebrating unity, yet they are blindly fanning the embers of nationalism and consumerism. This celebration of the nation-state ignores the brutal realities of border controls, power inequities, and the separatism these symbols enforce. It is a dangerous fantasy, a “unity” that whitewashes the very mechanisms of division and apartheid. Consider the grotesque spectacle of Tomorrowland’s mainstage, which, after burning down, was rebuilt with a narrative of heroic resilience, only to be unveiled with a Coca-Cola tag and a high density of even more specific nation flags.
In stark contrast, artists are now weaponizing the only power they have left: their absence. The mass boycotts of The Great Escape and SXSW are not mere protests; they are a form of radical curation, the embodied practice of the ‘critical rave’ called for by movements like Micelio. When artists like Massive Attack and Brian Eno speak out or the Lambrini Girls pull out of a Superstruct event, when any artist cancels, they are enacting what femme theorist Lila Rose calls “the solidarity of the absent body”. As she writes, “Our refusal to appear is our most powerful appearance. The empty stage is a louder speaker than any PA system. It amplifies the screams the Complex tries to drown out with bass”.

The Paradox of Scale
The pursuit of a truly radical gathering is confronted by an aesthetic and political paradox: the problem of scale and refinement. Can a collective experience be artistically ambitious, eschewing the crude minimalism of the purely makeshift and remain politically and spiritually uncorrupted? The lure of the monumental, the desire to orchestrate an experience of sublime, collective awe, is not inherently a capitalist one; it is a profound human impulse that has produced the cathedral and the ancient Greek tragedy. The true challenge, therefore, is not to reject ambition, but to reinvent it: to build a cathedral whose architecture is not dictated by a distant diocese, but is co-authored by the congregation itself.
This necessitates a radical redefinition of artistic “quality”, divorcing it from the slick, commodifiable sheen of the Industrial Complex and re-anchoring it in the depth of participatory, transformative experience. The question shifts from ‘How impressive is the spectacle?’ to ‘How profound is the participation?’ As the underground manifesto The Viscous Ethic argues, “A perfectly mixed sound system that serves a passive audience is a tool of hypnosis. A cruder system that demands the crowd's sonic empathy to complete its frequency is a tool of consciousness”. The ambition, then, is not for grandiose production but for a grandiosity of spirit, a scale measured not in attendance or production value, but in the intensity of shared vulnerability, cognitive risk, and mutual creation.
This is the delicate, high-wire act of the Temporary Autonomous Zone. It is a form that, as Gutter Paradise acidly clarifies, “is not a free license for white boys with synthesizers to be sloppy. It is a mandate for a more rigorous, collective discipline - one of mutual aid, deep ecological respect, and a consent-forward eroticism that transforms the dancefloor from a site of consumption to a theater of unalienated desire”. In this context, the refined artwork is not the passive spectacle witnessed, but the actively sustained, intricately woven social sculpture of the space itself. It is a fragile, magnificent achievement that honours the sacred not through sanctimony, but by remaining defiantly, joyfully profane, and fiercely accountable to the community that breathes it into being.

The Trajectory of Countercultural Degradation
The trajectory of counterculture usually follows a predictable arc from insurrection to brand: a grim procession where every authentic gesture is inevitably processed into a product. The contemporary festival landscape is a graveyard of these sold-out revolutions, a corporate simulacrum where the original rave’s radical potential has been systematically financialized into a ghost of itself.
Burning Man’s anarcho-communitarian principles have curdled into a techno-feudalist parody, a LinkedIn network that was once a pioneering temporary autonomous zone. Tomorrowland, Coachella, Ultra stand as the pure, undiluted endgame: pathogens of consumerism so aggressively vacuous they define the genre. Noteworthy, 21st century madness, is the imitation of the imitation, as seen in Germany’s Parookaville, a monumental, town-scale of “spectacle” and shallowness.
Recently-acquired-by-KKR Sónar & Sziget, follow suite. Boiler Room, Awakenings, more Superstruct family acquisitions. From this decay, a thousand lesser clones proliferate, the Medicine Festivals and their ilk, selling neo-shamanic cacao and appropriated ritual to a bourgeoisie desperate to purchase the enlightenment they cannot earn. Instead of witnessing an evolutionary change, we witness embalming. The managerial class orchestrating these events are mere cartographers of a territory they have never dared to inhabit. Against this hollowing out, we must reclaim not the party, but the practice, the illicit, embodied knowledge of the true mystery religions, which understood that real transcendence is not an escape from the political, but a deeper engagement with it.
Towards the Feral Gathering
If the project is to dismantle the Industrial Complex and reclaim the gathering, then this requires a move from vague awareness to a program of uncompromising, hyper-accountable praxis, infused with the psychedelic wisdom of the underground. It means building not just parties, but actual Temporary Magickal Autonomous Zones with the political clarity of a raw, electrifying rave flyer.
First - Financial Insurgency & Ecstatic Economics
The goal is sovereignty, not scale. Faustian bargains of sponsorship are slippery slopes to loss of autonomy. Instead we could be embracing models of mutual aid, subsidised tickets, and community-funded budgets. As the queer-feminist collective behind the party series ‘Syster System’ outlines, “The budget is the first setlist. Where the money comes from and where it goes dictates the entire vibrational frequency of the night”. They advocate for ‘ecstatic economics’, where financial transparency is part of the event’s aesthetic, a radical act of trust and shared responsibility.
Second - Radical Pedagogy and Psychedelic Consciousness
The festival can be a curriculum for liberation, a “consciousness-raising with a kick-drum”, to borrow a phrase from psychedelic community organizer Zara Z. Workshops on risk reduction and installations detailing the links between fossil fuel sponsors and ecological collapse ought to be as central as ‘the headliner’. The line between the dancefloor and the workshop tent must blur. This is that embodiment that Terre Thaemlitz, in their critical work on ambient music, warns against: the unexamined, euphoric demand for “unity” that silences dissent. True solidarity is messy, difficult, and requires taking a stand - also, who the actual fuck still has headliners?!
Third - Reclamation & Redirection
We gotta evolve strategy beyond mere withdrawal and actively reclaim the cultural ground lost to the Complex. This means creating compelling alternatives and amplifying counter-narratives that expose the financial pipelines and political cowardice of corporate festivals. Our power lies within a collective redirection of resources: artists and crews choosing to work with ethical promoters, technicians openly sharing knowledge on building independent infrastructure, and a unified effort to nurture the talent that gives these events their soul. As Rigged advocates, “Starve the mothership”. It is not enough to build our own world; we must consciously withdraw our energy from the simulacrum that mimics it.
Fourth - What Kind of Friend & Neighbour Are You?
The most potent form of resistance is not a performative post from a sanitized festival ground, but the daily, unglamorous work of building resilient local ecologies, of culture, of mutual aid, of soil. To stand in allyship with a neighbour, to uplift a local artist, to challenge the bigotry in one's own scene: these are the tangible geometries of solidarity. While the gaze is fixed on injustices thousands of miles away, a vital, yet often disembodied, concern, the architecture of oppression is reinforced daily in our immediate proximity. Changing the world begins not with a hashtag, but by holding power to account in the room you are actually in.
Fifth - Embracing the Freaky
The future of the radical gathering lies in its ability to be feral, untamable, and inconvenient. It lies in the warehouse party that operates on a gift economy, the sound system built from scavenged parts, the line-up that prioritizes dissonant noise and healing frequencies over marketable bangers. It is in the spirit of the Gutter Paradise zine, which declares: “We are not here to build a better festival. We are here to burn down the concept of the festival and plant a garden in the ashes where weird flowers can grow, unmonetized and unapologetic”.
Being Ungovernable
The Festival Industrial Complex is the enemy of music’s historical mission. It depoliticizes where music radicalizes. To reclaim the rave is to recognize that the dancefloor was always a rehearsal for the revolution. There is no neutral vibe; there is only solidarity or sliding further into complicity.
This is not a doctrine for festival puritanism or a manifesto for competitive karma-olympics, nor is this finger-pointing from an altar of imagined purity.
The critique is born from love, from the visceral memory of a track, a beat and a groove that realigned your brain stem, of eye contact in a crowd that felt like a religious experience, of a dawn that broke in an indescribably and painfully beautiful way. It is a defence of the rebellious, the weird, the psychedelic, the exhausting rave timewarp.. those rare, deeply affecting moments where art and communion fuse into a reason for being.
These are not trivial pleasures; they are among the sweetest pursuits that give texture and meaning to a life. The argument is not in creating an unattainable golden standard, but instead for allegiance, to that sacred frequency against its corporate simulacrum.
The soullessness of the commercialised simulacrum lies not in the absence of joy one may feel there, the joy can be real and valid, but in its financial underbelly: a joy that is algorithmically curated, financially extracted, and ultimately a replaceable commodity, a paradox where the most profound communal feelings are engineered to feed the very machinery that renders genuine community a threat. This is because real community operates on a logic that is inherently opposed to the Complex’s core drive: the extraction of maximal financial value from human connection. Community is about holding breakdowns as dearly as breakthroughs, about sticking through thick and thin, in the high highs and the low lows, not as perfect avatars of ourselves but in messy vulnerability and shared risks, which becomes a sanctuary from the alienating market and a practice of building a world outside of it. It is where you go to heal from the pathologies of capitalism.
“A crew that can throw a legendary party in a warehouse with zero budget is a crew that has demonstrated it doesn’t need the market to live a meaningful life.” - Rigged
We all participate in numerous industrial-complexes, and our lives are twisted in dark, delirious ways, so the story is far from simple. This is an eruption of thought, that itself welcomes critique and dialogue, but refuses to submit to apathy or conformity.
We navigate a world that contorts us with pressures we did not ask for and bends us into shapes we did not choose. This is simply a call to keep the conversation and our worldmaking practices alive, to remember the shape of our own dance, and to stand up, however messily, for the spaces where this dance can remain our own.
The beat will go on, but it must be an ungovernable beat, a beat scored with the ink of a thousand underground pamphlets, a rhythm composed of absent bodies making their presence felt, a frequency tuned not to the market, but to the messy, beautiful, and relentless sound of liberation.

writing: ivan march
editing: sayfen895
watercolors: merny
——————————————————————
References
Albanese, Francesca. Report of the Special Rapporteur on the situation of human rights in the Palestinian Territory occupied since 1967. United Nations General Assembly, 2024.
Dirty Data. “Issue 4: The Surveillance Vibe.” Anarchivist Press, 2023.
Glitch is a Bitch. “Vol. 2: Sonic Insurrection.” Edited by Collective Unrest, 2022. [Online Zine].
Gutter Paradise. “Issue 7: Weird Flowers.” Self-published, 2024.
Maloney, Isobel. The Politics of Partying. Routledge, 2022.
moore, m. (2018). Fabulous: The rise of the beautiful eccentric. Yale University Press.
Pelly, Liz. “The Problem with Muzak.” The Baffler, no. 45, 2019, pp. 54-61.
Rigged: A Fanzine for System Failure. “Issue 1: The Condom on the Soul.” Anonymous collective, 2023.
Rose, Lila. “The Solidarity of the Absent Body: A Manifesto for Collective Care.” Encrypted Circulation, 2024.
St John, Graham. Global Tribe: Technology, Spirituality and Psytrance. Equinox Publishing, 2012.
Syster System. “The Budget is the First Setlist: A Zine on Ecstatic Economics.” Self-published, 2023.
Template, Mars. “Tenderly Brutal: On Femme and Trans Safety in Unsafe Spaces.” Tenderly Brutal Zine, Issue 3, 2021.
Thaemlitz, Terre. Terre Thaemlitz / DJ Sprinkles: Essays and Conversations. Comatose Recordings, 2018.
Z, Zara. “Consciousness-Raising with a Kick-Drum: Notes from the Psychedelic Underground.” Lecture, Intersectional Ecstasy Conference, 2023.